Search EDI

Latest Stories

 

 

 

By Industry

MRO



MBA Member

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
EDI Resources
Featured Sections

« Iraq raises oil reserve estimates by 24%, surpassing Iran | Main | "Radical solution" needed to get EVs powered up and on the roads »
Monday
Oct042010

EU gives Canada one-year extension for oil sands evaluation

Possible green trade barriers deferred in draft of fuel quality directives from EU

 

By Pete Harrison

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Europe has yielded to Canadian pressure by delaying possible green trade barriers to Canada's highly polluting oil sands, but only for one year, a leaked document shows.

Canada has repeatedly warned that draft EU standards to promote greener fuels will harm the market for its oil sands -- tar-like oil that is trapped in sediment and forms the world's second-largest proven crude reserves after Saudi Arabia.

A recent draft of the European Union's "fuel quality directive" calculates greenhouse gas emissions from myriad transport fuels, from hydrogen to diesel, but says oil sands will only be evaluated some time before December 31, 2011 -- a year later than plans made as recently as June.

All other fuels will be dealt with by the end of this year, with the aim of guiding industry on which fuels are best suited to the EU's goal of cutting carbon emissions to one fifth below 1990 levels over the next decade.

The European Union and Canada are in the middle of free trade talks, and the issue of tar sands has become hot.

Relations are already strained after the EU banned imports of seal products last July on animal welfare grounds, a move Canada is challenging at the World Trade Organization.

TRADE BARRIERS

Environmentalists oppose the industry, saying the extra energy needed to extract oil from the north Alberta sands intensifies the damage they do to the climate, while wastes from extraction harm wildlife and pollute rivers.

But Canada has written to EU environment officials warning any attempt at green regulation could create "barriers to trade."

Europe seems to have taken the advice.

"The Commission shall propose by December 31, 2011 how to address high greenhouse gas intensity sources," says the document seen by Reuters on Monday. "This proposal shall, in particular, introduce default values for fossil fuels derived from tar sands and oil shale."

The Commission had initially proposed that tar sands be ascribed a greenhouse gas value of 107 grams per megajoule of fuel, making it clear to buyers that it had far greater environmental impact than diesel at 87.4 grams or petrol at 85.8 grams.

But the Commission -- which acts as the European Union's executive -- has since dropped the oils sands value, and now argues the science is too uncertain to act.

Politicians in the European Parliament accuse the Commission of bowing to industry and thereby undermining its own climate objectives. They site 12 scientific studies that put the impact close to 107 grams.

"We are talking about an activity that is expected to destroy...one quarter of the intact forests of this world," Greek socialist politician Kriton Arsenis told Philip Owen, one of the Commission's top climate officials, in a debate last week.

 

 

 

IMPORTANT: No advice is offered or given in this article or this publication. PLEASE ALWAYS REFER TO AN EXPERT before acting on any information contained in any of our stories.
Copyright © 2006-10, Blogertize Publications (http://www.blogertize.com), except as otherwise indicated. Text may be excerpted UNALTERED with FULL CREDIT and LINK. PHOTOS MAY NOT BE COPIED, DOWNLOADED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. Note: Some photos of real people may be models used to illustrate the editorial concept. MISSION: "You Need to Know" Our publications are daily online newspapers and magazines (webzines), plus delivered Ezines. Our stories also appear on various newswire services and are picked up in other publications. Our reporters and journalists break or report stories and their sources and source information are protected by the doctrine of free press as expressed in the First Amendment, Reporter's Privilege statutes, and also the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. COMMENTS FROM USERS: We invite dialogue and comments from our readers and limit moderation to obscenity and privacy issues, however WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER FOR THIS CONTENT. We believe in the doctrine of FREE SPEECH. COMMENTS AND MOST STORIES ARE FROM OUTSIDE CONTRIBUTORS AND READERS AND NOT A REFLECTION OF THE OPINIONS OF THIS MAGAZINE. The opinions expressed by our writers, columnists and reporters are their opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this magazine, its writers and staff, or Blogertize Publications.TM - Our magazine names are trademarked. Our publications team provide this ezine and web site and its contents in good faith but makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to this web site or its contents. We disclaim any representations and warranties, whether express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of any kind. In addition, we do not represent or warrant that the information accessible via this web site or the products or services sold or given free on it are accurate, complete or current. Errors and Omissions Excepted. By using/visiting this site you agree that use information herein is at your own risk. PRIVACY: SPAM POLICY: We do not use, nor do we condone the use of unsolicited bulk email. Our email system is an opt-in only. Please report any incidents of unsolicited email coming from or mentioning our domain to editor AT blogeritze.com. All matters will be investigated and dealt with promptly.  Jurisdiction: Any action or dispute arising from the use of information on this site will be deemed to have been undertaken and concluded in Toronto, Canada and will be interpreted, construed and enforced in all respects in accordance with the laws of Canada and all parties thereto shall submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ontario courts. A visitor agrees that the applicable law to be applied shall, in all cases, be that of the city of the web site owner, namely, Toronto, Canada.


Persona Corp. and Blogertize publishes several webzines, magazines, e-zines for news, entertainment and information, but cautions readers to read the USAGE NOTICE. Our mandate: "You Need to Know!"

Auto News (autonews.co): The latest news, reviews and views on all things automobile

Automobile Buzz (automobilebuzz.com): Everyone's favorite zine with the latest road tests, videos, and breaking news with special focus on sportscars and greencars

Films and Books Magazine - News from Hollywood and New York, Books and Films

• Canadian Money Magazine

Webzine (webzine.co): Reviews of the best, newest and brightest of webzines, print to web conversion zines, ezines and online publications.

* Noetic News: News, Features, Research on the Science of Consciousness 

* Dog and Cat World: You can't know too much about your best friend. 

* Dogs and Cats Life: A Magazine on dogs, cats and pets focused on health, wellness, happiness and the pet lifestyle 

* Advance Magazine - Body, Mind, Spirit

* LINK Magazine: Good News Report

* EDI Weekly

* Secure Network News

* Crime Report USA

* Wise Tarot Magazine

* Asian Collector Magazine

* Buddha Weekly - Buddhist news, events, profiles from all traditions.

* Buddhist Antique Magazine

* Noetic Journal and the Science of Consciousness, reporting on the latest in Noetic Sciences and theory.


Social Network

* Blogertize on TWITTER

* Blogertize on MySpace

Contributors

Jessica Lyric, Film Critic

• James McKinnon, Editor

Derek Armstrong, Chief Crime Correspondent, Crime Report USA, contributor various

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>