EPA will push, not force, industry to cut greenhouse gases
Thursday, November 11, 2010 at 05:34PM
By Timothy Gardner
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. environmental regulators said on Wednesday they will not force coal plants and manufacturers to adopt specific technologies to cut greenhouse gas output, but will push them to become more energy efficient in order to comply with looming climate rules.
The move by the Environmental Protection agency, or EPA, helped relieve some fears in the industries that the agency would require emitters to quickly invest in expensive, unproven technologies to cut output of gases blamed for global warming. But industry groups did complain they would not have enough time to comply with the rules.
The EPA is taking steps to regulate greenhouse gases because Congress failed to pass a climate bill this year. Some lawmakers and industry groups are trying to stop them from regulating.
Starting January 2 of 2011 the EPA plans to start requiring big emitters such as power plants, refineries and cement manufacturers to obtain permits for polluting greenhouse gases.
"We believe this approach will in most cases lead to improvements in energy efficiency," Gina McCarthy, an EPA assistant administrator on air and radiation, told reporters in a teleconference.
The agency released on Wednesday guidance on the best available control technologies, or BACT, that companies should use to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases. The companies will have to adhere to the guidelines when expanding or building new plants or factories, and work with state and local air authorities to decide which technology works best for them.
In addition, the EPA will not require or define a specific technology for any emitter. Companies that own coal-fired power plants had feared they would be required to invest costly, unproven technologies to capture carbon dioxide before it comes out of smokestacks and bury it underground.
Power plants and manufacturers would likely become more efficient by upgrading their boilers or squeezing more energy from coal through established technologies.
McCarthy said efficiency improvements are less costly than other controls and offer emitters fuel savings and also cut emissions of pollution like particulates that cause health problems.
MORATORIUM
Jeff Holmstead, a former EPA assistant administrator under George W. Bush who now works for the law firm Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, said he expected the EPA guidance could lead to a moratorium for a few years on new construction of big plants.
McCarthy denied that suggestion. "Make no mistake about it this does not represent an opportunity for any construction moratorium," she said. "There will be no stoppage as a result of this BACT process."
And an air regulation expert said the EPA move would not put heavy costs on polluters.
"EPA's guidance will provide industry greater certainty, quicker permitting decisions and a smoother path toward greenhouse gas implementation," said William Becker, the executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies.
"This should put to rest the exaggerated claims of some stakeholders that greenhouse gas permitting will have disastrous economic consequences," Becker said.
IMPORTANT: No advice is offered or given in this article or this publication. PLEASE ALWAYS REFER TO AN EXPERT before acting on any information contained in any of our stories.
Copyright © 2006-10, Blogertize Publications (http://www.blogertize.com), except as otherwise indicated. Text may be excerpted UNALTERED with FULL CREDIT and LINK. PHOTOS MAY NOT BE COPIED, DOWNLOADED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. Note: Some photos of real people may be models used to illustrate the editorial concept. MISSION: "You Need to Know" Our publications are daily online newspapers and magazines (webzines), plus delivered Ezines. Our stories also appear on various newswire services and are picked up in other publications. Our reporters and journalists break or report stories and their sources and source information are protected by the doctrine of free press as expressed in the First Amendment, Reporter's Privilege statutes, and also the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. COMMENTS FROM USERS: We invite dialogue and comments from our readers and limit moderation to obscenity and privacy issues, however WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER FOR THIS CONTENT. We believe in the doctrine of FREE SPEECH. COMMENTS AND MOST STORIES ARE FROM OUTSIDE CONTRIBUTORS AND READERS AND NOT A REFLECTION OF THE OPINIONS OF THIS MAGAZINE. The opinions expressed by our writers, columnists and reporters are their opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this magazine, its writers and staff, or Blogertize Publications.TM - Our magazine names are trademarked. Our publications team provide this ezine and web site and its contents in good faith but makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to this web site or its contents. We disclaim any representations and warranties, whether express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of any kind. In addition, we do not represent or warrant that the information accessible via this web site or the products or services sold or given free on it are accurate, complete or current. Errors and Omissions Excepted. By using/visiting this site you agree that use information herein is at your own risk. PRIVACY: SPAM POLICY: We do not use, nor do we condone the use of unsolicited bulk email. Our email system is an opt-in only. Please report any incidents of unsolicited email coming from or mentioning our domain to editor AT blogeritze.com. All matters will be investigated and dealt with promptly. Jurisdiction: Any action or dispute arising from the use of information on this site will be deemed to have been undertaken and concluded in Toronto, Canada and will be interpreted, construed and enforced in all respects in accordance with the laws of Canada and all parties thereto shall submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ontario courts. A visitor agrees that the applicable law to be applied shall, in all cases, be that of the city of the web site owner, namely, Toronto, Canada.
Persona Corp. and Blogertize publishes several webzines, magazines, e-zines for news, entertainment and information, but cautions readers to read the USAGE NOTICE. Our mandate: "You Need to Know!"
• Auto News (autonews.co): The latest news, reviews and views on all things automobile
• Automobile Buzz (automobilebuzz.com): Everyone's favorite zine with the latest road tests, videos, and breaking news with special focus on sportscars and greencars
• Films and Books Magazine - News from Hollywood and New York, Books and Films
• Webzine (webzine.co): Reviews of the best, newest and brightest of webzines, print to web conversion zines, ezines and online publications.
* Noetic News: News, Features, Research on the Science of Consciousness
* Dog and Cat World: You can't know too much about your best friend.
* Advance Magazine - Body, Mind, Spirit
* LINK Magazine: Good News Report
* Buddha Weekly - Buddhist news, events, profiles from all traditions.
Social Network
Contributors
• Derek Armstrong, Chief Crime Correspondent, Crime Report USA, contributor various
Reader Comments